PostFrontal Forum
PostFrontal Forum
PF Home | International_Forum | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ | Upload image
Username:
 Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 LK8000 International Support
 Developers
 Mc value in overlay		  New Topic  Reply to Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

freewing70
Pterodattilo

Italy
1076 Posts
Posted - 25/01/2012 :  14:50:18  Show Profile  Visit freewing70's Homepage  Reply with Quote
If you set a Safety Mc (i.e. 1.4) on the corresponding value in the overlay you read 0.0.
It would be nice to be able to see the real Mc value used for calculations.
aeroclub valle d'aosta
http://www.aecaosta.it

Coolwind
Moderator

Italy
7511 Posts
Posted - 25/01/2012 :  15:35:51  Show Profile  Visit Coolwind's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Yes this is a good point. I dont know if it is possible for the 3.0.
Go to Top of Page

MPusz
Aquila imperiale

Poland
683 Posts
Posted - 25/01/2012 :  22:19:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Hmm, I am not sure if that is the best idea. MC value displayed on the overlay is also strictly connected to the STF value. I may want to know STF for 0 MC even if safety is set to 0,5. When the interface will not allow the pilot to set lower values than the Safety MC than that value again will not be a safety value because it will be on the border of the envelope.
Go to Top of Page

Coolwind
Moderator

Italy
7511 Posts
Posted - 26/01/2012 :  00:35:44  Show Profile  Visit Coolwind's Homepage  Reply with Quote
I think we are saying a different thing, Mat.
When looking at the MC overlay, if the arrival altitude below is relative to a safetyMC which is lower than the one overprinted, then we should tell . Like we do for safety altitude, basically.
Without changing anything else. Only a small box like for +300m , in my case.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
Jump To:
PostFrontal Forum © 2005-2010 PostFrontal - La community del Volo a Vela Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.14 seconds. Snitz Forums 2000